Just think about all the fish who die because pure lithium is thrown into the ocean? The life where we don’t see what is good about it since 99% of the sea hasn’t been discovered. Some might think that life will live and thrive from waste.

That’s not only the Fjord but all the surrounding areas will have mass extinction of precious raw and other plant lives in the depths even 100 kilometers away! Now, think of a mission, smoke a trouble, and lose all of your memory!

That, that, life is more important than their money! Still, there’s time, there are possible things to achieve. At least we know that if we would use time and effort for things these times, we might beat the clock and win against mining waste, that all countries are doing to make a profit, maybe one day you’ll look at something like this, but it’s all to late?

No, we still have time, but time is necessary, and time isn’t necessary! And we must use it wisely, now just months or days before the death of the sea and it will surely be a daily life for those who hate the government doing what they shouldn’t.

Why not build a big Castle of Waste? Why not dump your mining waste into a cement housing, either at the side of the mountain or around it? Look at the above picture, at least we can see the whole waste with cement around and plastic ground, to reduce water going into areas around, but water does not cause harm to this project as the water wouldn’t leak out.

It could be drained for processing, or stay there for eternity, a big facility as the picture above is enough for all waste to be deposited on land and it can also become very tall, maybe about 200-300 meters up.

Unless we use a housing roof that drains away rainwater, in such a way we would not be forced to take out the polluted mining wastewater, thus making it possible to seal so leaks don’t come out of the cement ground if they could wear the plastic in the bottom.

At least we here at diesoftly, are not only the people who cherish the world. But those who do not should be punished equally. At least in the bitter end, people who saved this planet were those who saved our planet, because they thought they could save it.

At least many of us knew it and never stopped doing anything. Dedication to changing the future is a few warriors’ mighty swords. At least the last dragon in this world would be found, only the one who fought against them all, the bitter war where words were weapons.

Who it might be is a long tale not fully told. But at least people who are crazy enough yeah, those are the ones to change the world!

What shall we do? We must inform many politicians about this, your country your rulers needs the call, needs your emails, and emails are the most efficient! Just remember to send them a big Emojii, a big one with a smile and laughter so that they surely won’t forget the letter or just something like this at the end:

In the end regulation of the private sector will be the only solution to all problems people face, if politicians have rules then people follow the rules, if they are arrested for breaking them, it’s socialism in a nutshell.

You might want to know about what Norway is doing. And what biodiversity they are destroying in one of their most precious places. So you can look at a few smaller whales from time to time. These are animals who will feed on rotten fish and die out too:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/jan/12/norway-to-allow-mining-waste-to-be-dumped-in-fjords

If you achieve earning on our articles, don’t forget to donate 10% to us.

Maybe all planets die out when we don’t maintain them, at least? When should we be doing it? Perhaps the future might tell us everything we dear to know. Maybe there are hidden realms beyond our planet. Does that somehow affect our progress in science?

Earth’s Interior Is Cooling “Much Faster Than Expected”

But we have a unique way to store radioactive junk in the core. To re-heat it if possible. But at least the whole idea goes up to where we flush the radioactive waste into the core. Would that be dangerous enough?

Well perhaps it would, but not if the device is made of metal casing that withstands lava temperatures, that this device lowered into the core of a volcano? Wouldn’t that be possible? Well, we might use this idea as it is worth.

But let’s look at what Finland does, they deposit the radioactive waste long down in the mountains, such there is still a place to put it somewhere. Perhaps not all countries can do the process of storing radioactive waste below ground.

Buy your DeroGold at cratex.io for this opportunity to be possible for a mere cost of cents. Since that is truly a well-made coin, don’t jump on just one, there are several coins to buy, and to HODL, and even for 500$ you could become a millionaire.

At least when you not only put your trusted money into DeroGold where there are promising coins like POScoin, XgameCoin, MNG, BTCMZ, and Womencoin.

We are backed up on that cryptocurrency, and coins will count all our endeavors selling quotes to all stored Radioactivity waste to be dumped into the core. Even plutonium is each day danger with hands to the terrorists.

Where to hold the waste would cost millions for just their storage. And it surely does need the correct type of investment. So get a hand of DEGO, which is DeroGold, and we on  DieSofly have bought us up with a desirable amount.

But as soon as the plan is vibrant, the possibility is sooner. So get down to business and invest in our dream.

We have taken the dream of pushing Fukushima and Tjernobyl to the bottom and the newer wasted nuclear stations that can happen every 30 years. We now can have a dream that all radioactive waste will be 100% clean by leaving it to the mantle cores thus enabling us so we would want an increase in mantle core temperatures if a chain reaction happens.

Well, it sounds terrific, but at least the lava would not spill up on the ground after materials have been processed in it. The idea to warm the mantle core is a bigger project, and just one amount of waste wouldn’t heat it at nearly any percentage.

This technology might already be innovative. It is genuinely unique. Indeed, the future needs more creative ideas so this planet won’t be a waste planet. The problem with the mantle waste yards is that you can’t put too much in; you have to take out a proportion of what you put in since you wouldn’t want volcanic eruptions on some plutonium in the core.

But let us say something clearly, putting a large amount of other waste into a volcano might be a good idea, especially if we deal with materials that can burn, but cost too much to burn or make storage, as perhaps certain waste chemicals.

Maybe the solution to throw waste in the mantle core would be substantially a far better idea when it can’t be stored and is well if it’s far more expensive to get rid of. Maybe the only solution is to pour it into a volcano, we talk about different acid chemicals that are so strong that they destroy any storage.

Many profile-driven companies would doom our earth if they didn’t take out a particular part. Did you know? Indonesia, Thailand, and Japan had their tsunamis because the companies did not replace the ground from the oil with sediment a way pressure was so low that the ground unfilled with water would make an eruption into the air for several hundred meters up.

Water would fall on the ground, then a huge amount of water would withdraw from the land, and then again come as an aggressive amount of water on the land as we call a tsunami. This is what happened in Thailand if you follow the videos about it. As soon as water withdraws from the land, a big area falls into the ground and draws all the water, and yes, then the tsunami comes.

That’s why these dire situations happened because of oil rigs. And the day you see a tsunami hot, perhaps South America? That you will know they didn’t fill the ground. Every country is warned of this Uther insane situation about this. But no one knows how it would be a situation. Listen to some music to vibe on it:

Perhaps buying a Hybrid car as an electric vehicle would be best in countries with little electricity available. All you are trying to spend on gasoline is about 0.33 per mile, while regular cars drive 0.65 per mile.

You can buy a hybrid car with about 100 kilometers range on the battery, then it’s convenient as an extra battery that can also become loaded with energy for a couple of miles while charging at home.

We would enforce this singular act by deciphering the use of engines and their weight of CO2 emission when we on Earth have 0.04% CO2 in the air. But honestly, they are the fact that exists today; with a superior build, anyone can drive a mile for 0.10 gallons.

The difference is to use engines that are not only near emission-free superiorly. We create some fuel daily for all cars, and fuel consumption will not be reduced until we truly act bravely upon getting ourselves a hybrid vehicle.

Truly on time we depend on other sources as fuel until we can reduce the consumption by about 40%. 40% is much, and motors made up of only electric power will someday be the best, now is the worst, since the cost to build a car in such a way is extensively larger than a hybrid car.

Supposedly you could manufacture about 5 Hybrid cars and 1 full electric car of the same amount of materials, the battery costs the most, and we can’t replace batteries in electric vehicles, the whole car needs to be sent to a junkyard.

Not only are machines running on fuel needed, but we must also use empowered fuel to create energy. But in the short term, only battery-driven cars and their counterpart fuel-driven cars ain’t efficient for many countries.

We must one day come up with electric-charged fuel, until then a reduction of fuel consumption on many ordinary vehicles by about 33% would be more reasonable, especially if batteries can be replaced in Hybrid cars and can work for more than 10 years.

Most electric vehicles work only for about 5 years until they start to mess up with a flat battery or recharge capacity being smaller year after year.

It’s terrible meeting terrible when we use the wrong method of energy. Not only has this been ongoing for quite a long with idiotic ideas and more populistic choices than smart convenient and energy-sparing.

Norway, with its beautiful rivers, effortlessly provides power for battery-driven cars. But countries with import electricity wouldn’t dare use the technology. You might as well come up with a recharge station lacking in many countries, especially in Africa, and smarter solution would be to produce cars that truly can work for their countries.

But in fact, there are several ways that we need to understand that change our print on this earth. We need different progressions towards this. Indeed if you use your income to buy DeroGold, we have a significant stake in that coin.

Might our projects be worth something? Well, one day they will, so don’t miss investing in cratex.io for many sorts of crypto, we would like you to check out POScoin, MNG, XGameCoin, and WomenCoin, these coins will make many millionaires in one night.

Cryptocurrency would suit the future to create all our ideas into matter. Not only is this dream big, but there are ways to succeed, we nearly have no time before the nuke of not “CO2” but “Chemicals!” drops upon us, and we cannot miserably change anything when the whole world used up their resources and couldn’t travel beyond the stars!

What do we need? What do we want? We want a low-emission car that surpluses with an additional battery that is effortless when driving and is energized by the engine, which does not need to be other than a fuel-burning engine to load the battery. The difference would be if everyone could invest in something worth something rather than the opposite.

Likewise, many with a Tesla nowadays have a samlet to load up battery when driving for a long time. Well, it’s efficient, it does give enough battery energy at most. But is that the best?

Well, for me engines running on gas being Hybrid is by far the most reasonable thing to use, you can get biogas from recycling food in big processing units that collect methane gas. Surely it would be a future creating bioenergy out of waste. Even plastic as far we know it when microwaved will split up to become fuel and gas.

Do we need at least a hybrid car that uses a different energy source? In these golden times, we need a second engine that can generate energy and most likely Hydrogen cars will be the next future, not only is the process of splitting water into Hydrogen and Oxygen far more reasonable nowadays.

Surely would a loss of energy be so little that a Hybrid car running on electrolysis creates enough Hydrogen by how much it can again burn the Hydrogen? Likewise, salt water and Hydrogen Oxide. Nearly budging to give power for around 0.01$ the price when ordinary fuel is 1$. 100 times cheaper consumption so far.

Future cars will be triple #Hybrid

As my vision and dreams are set for that

You will be using saltwater, batteries and Hydrogen+Oxide motors all!#TripleHybridCar #TripleHybrid#Saltcar #Hydrogen

Using electrochemistry to create fuel out of sea water!#Future #Toyota @Toyota pic.twitter.com/MDqrFj58rk

— deaLazer.com – 🤪”DealAy-Zer”彡★🐬 (@Dealazer) November 5, 2020